- enable automatic disposition for onboarding, monitoring, or Direct API search workflows
- choose between Hint Mode and Full Auto Mode
- interpret true match, false match, and undetermined predictions
- tune confidence thresholds before analysts rely on the output
- test safely in a Calibration workspace before applying settings in Live
- review automatic disposition evidence during match QA and audit
Automatic disposition is workspace-scoped. Start in a Calibration workspace,
collect examples, and only copy the approved settings into Live after the
review criteria are documented.
How Automatic Disposition Works
Automatic disposition runs after Minerva has produced a potential match. It does not replace screening or match scoring. Instead, it evaluates the potential match, assigns a prediction, and returns a rationale that analysts can inspect. For each supported workflow, Minerva can return:
Automatic disposition output is visible on the potential match, so reviewers can see whether Minerva only provided a hint or actually applied a disposition.
Configure The Feature
Open Automatic Disposition from tenant configuration. Select the workspace you want to configure before changing any settings. The page includes global enablement, workflow enablement, mode selection, thresholds, and optional prompt guidance.Global Enablement
Turn on Enable automatic disposition to let Minerva run this post-processing step for the selected workspace. When the global toggle is off:- no automatic disposition predictions are generated for that workspace
- outcome settings and thresholds are preserved but inactive
- analysts continue using the standard potential match review flow
Workflow Enablement
Automatic disposition can be enabled independently for:
Enable one workflow at a time during calibration. Each channel can have different review patterns, data freshness, and analyst tolerance for automation.
Direct API Channel
The Direct API channel applies the same modes, outcomes, and confidence thresholds to searches submitted directly through the Minerva API. When it is enabled for a workspace:- Screened potential matches returned by
POST /v1/search-sync,GET /v1/search-sync, and batch search results carry anautomatic_dispositionordisposition_hintannotation in the API response. - Full Auto Mode sets the match
review_statusbefore the synchronous response or batch row completes. Hint Mode returns an advisory annotation, leaves the matchunresolved, and lets the integration interpret the prediction in real time. - Computing dispositions adds a few seconds per screened entity to
search-syncresponses and batch row completion. - An integration can opt a single request out with the
X-Minerva-Automatic-Disposition: skipheader. The header is inert unless the Direct API channel is enabled for the workspace of the Application whose API key is used.
Privacy Mode
Privacy mode controls how much personally identifiable information Minerva includes in the model context.
More restrictive privacy modes can reduce model context. Review calibration results before deciding that a stricter privacy mode is appropriate for Live.
Custom Prompt Guidance
Use the custom prompt field for organization-specific review criteria that analysts already apply, such as jurisdictional policy, source hierarchy, or evidence expectations. Good prompt guidance is:- short enough to be consistently applied
- written as policy criteria, not one-off instructions for a single customer
- aligned with your standard operating procedures
- tested against known true match and false match examples
Choose Hint Mode Or Full Auto Mode
Each outcome can use either Hint Mode or Full Auto Mode.
You can configure false match and true match outcomes separately. For example, an organization might start with false matches in Hint Mode, later move high-confidence false matches to Full Auto Mode, and keep true matches in Hint Mode for manual review.
Tune Confidence Thresholds
Each configured outcome has a confidence threshold from 0.00 to 1.00. The threshold controls how confident Minerva must be before that outcome is shown or applied.- Higher thresholds are stricter. They reduce the number of hints or automatic dispositions but should improve precision.
- Lower thresholds are broader. They can cover more matches but require more QA because weaker predictions are included.
- False match and true match thresholds should be calibrated independently.
- Undetermined predictions are expected when neither enabled outcome reaches its threshold.
Review Output In The Potential Match View
Automatic disposition appears in the potential match view so analysts can inspect the model output beside the underlying match evidence. The component shows:- whether the output was Applied or shown as a Hint
- the predicted disposition
- the confidence score
- the rationale behind the prediction
- any failure or timeout state when the model could not complete
Applied Results
An Applied label means Minerva used Full Auto Mode and the prediction met the configured threshold. For applied false matches, review QA samples to confirm that the rationale matches your analysts’ false-positive reasoning. Look for clear differences in identity, dates, locations, occupations, source records, or other evidence that supports non-match treatment. For applied true matches, confirm that your policy allows model-applied true match decisions. Some programs prefer true matches to stay in Hint Mode even after false matches move to Full Auto Mode.Hints
A Hint label means Minerva did not change the match status. The prediction is shown as review context. Use hints to build calibration evidence. Analysts should compare the hint with their own disposition and capture patterns where the model is helpful or wrong.Undetermined Predictions
Undetermined means Minerva did not find enough confidence for a configured outcome. Treat undetermined predictions as a normal result, especially during early calibration. They often indicate borderline matches, weak source evidence, or incomplete subject information. Do not lower thresholds solely to eliminate undetermined results unless QA confirms that the broader predictions remain reliable.Calibration Workspace Workflow
Use a Calibration workspace to test settings against real review examples without changing Live analyst outcomes.- Ask Minerva to enable the beta for the Calibration workspace.
- Open Administration > Configuration > Automatic Disposition.
- Select the Calibration workspace.
- Enable automatic disposition globally.
- Enable one workflow, usually onboarding first.
- Keep false match and true match outcomes in Hint Mode.
- Start with conservative thresholds.
- Save the settings with a change description that explains the calibration goal.
- Review potential matches where hints appear.
- Compare each hint to analyst disposition and note disagreement patterns.
- Adjust thresholds or prompt guidance in small increments.
- Repeat until the precision, coverage, and undetermined rate are acceptable.
- workflow and feed mix
- sample size reviewed
- number of false match, true match, and undetermined predictions
- agreement rate with analyst decisions
- serious disagreement examples
- threshold and prompt versions tested
- recommended Live posture
Promote Settings To Live
There is no separate promotion button for Automatic Disposition. After Calibration is approved, switch to the Live workspace and apply the approved settings there. Use this controlled rollout sequence:- Export or record the approved Calibration settings, thresholds, privacy mode, and prompt guidance.
- Switch the workspace selector to Live.
- Recreate the approved settings exactly.
- Keep outcomes in Hint Mode for the first Live observation window unless your governance process has already approved Full Auto Mode.
- Save with a change description that references the Calibration review.
- Monitor Live output volume, disagreement examples, and analyst feedback.
- Move an outcome to Full Auto Mode only when Live hints match the approved Calibration behavior.
- Revisit thresholds after source mix, workflow, or policy changes.
QA And Audit Checklist
Before enabling Full Auto Mode in Live, confirm that your team can answer:- Which workspace and workflow are affected?
- Which outcome is automated: false match, true match, or both?
- What thresholds are active?
- What calibration sample supports the threshold?
- What custom prompt guidance was used?
- Which user saved the change and why?
- How often will applied decisions be sampled for QA?
- Who can roll back the setting if output quality changes?
- model rationale for applied decisions
- match evidence and field-level identity comparison
- whether the same source or feed is overrepresented in disagreements
- whether policy changes require threshold or prompt updates
- whether analysts are relying on hints appropriately